Even though I hate to admit it, I am old enough to remember when ‘texting’ was not a verb…in fact I don’t think it was a word at all.

And tweeting meant something altogether different than it does now. Come to think of it, so did ‘messenger’ and ‘overnight’ and, well I could go on, but you get my drift.
Life is changing. Human communication is evolving seemingly everyday.

I went on a date recently (dating…a whole other topic), and the guy asked me what I wanted to do. I suggested grabbing a glass of wine somewhere, talking, getting to know each other. In response I saw a perfect imitation of a deer caught in the headlights of an onrushing Amtrak. Of course, that’s partially a Y-chromosome thing, but really, in this age of tapped out missives and profound observations of 140 characters or less, when did you last allow yourself to wallow in words with someone?  Yeah, that’s my point.
I have friends who text questions to me like, “How do you make turkey chili?” or “What did you think of my manuscript?” Really? What kind of answer do they expect…via text?
In response to the above questions, I tapped out “With great care.” And “You know Chapter Two? Well, it sucks.” Miraculously, my serial texters have learned how to dial my number.
When dining out have you ever looked around and seen how many people are fixated on their smartphones, thumbs flying—even while sitting with their loved ones? And it’s not just the kids…the parents do it, too. When my son was small and moved at the speed of heat, I used to take him out dinner just so I could make him sit in one place and actually have a conversation with me.

But now it seems texting is all we do. Nobody actually picks up the phone and calls anyone anymore. And families are more comfortable texting each other even though the various members might be in the same room—or at the same table. And teenagers! Sound bites are the keystones of their language… along with acronyms.

God forbid they actually have to discuss something…you know, that trite old custom where there was conversational give and take? And they might have to suffer the consequences of irritating the person they are having discourse with…and they might express their displeasure or disagreement in words and phrases longer than 140 characters. Today, that is almost considered a personal affront.
And all this electronic communication allows us to hide—to cloak ourselves in complete separation. And what does this distance, this extenuated form of communication do?
It makes us jerks… and really bad spellers (but I digress).
In his book, Ascent of the A-Word: A-holism, The first Sixty Years, Geoffrey Nunberg claims technology allows us to feel “closer” to folks with whom we differ ideologically. And the cloak of relative anonymity allowed by technological communication unshackles the latent A-hole in all of us. Oh joy.
Everyday I see evidence to support his theories and I bet you do as well. The things people feel comfortable saying to me in a text or a randomly sent missive, or even a anonymous review on a website, are not the same tone as they would adopt if they were within receiving distance of my response, be it by phone or in person. And their word usage is casually cruel, lacking the social niceties engendered by a sense of self-preservation that kicks in when a message is delivered personally, directly.
And the kids? LOL! We’ve done away with cursive writing. And tact. Next it’ll be spelling and sentence structure.

And so much of the art of communication will be lost.

Where do we draw the line?

So, what do you think?  Is all this quick and dirty “communication” a good thing or a bad thing?  And, if it’s a bad thing, how do you counter it?