It’s been a little over forty-eight hours since the announcement that Harlequin has joined in a self-publishing venture with Author Solutions, a vanity press.
I don’t want to quibble over definitions, so for the purpose of this article I use “self-publishing” and “vanity press” as meaning any book that an author pays to produce. Call it what you will, but the money is flowing FROM the author to a printer (I hesitate to say “publisher” because that’s insulting to the reputable publishers.)
There are legitimate reasons to self-publish a book. A family history, for example. Many schools use self-publishing as a fundraising tool, such as an annual recipe book or collections of stories written by students. Some small churches will self-publish prayer books. And sometimes, authors who have been rejected across the board but (and I stress the BUT) have had impartial and repeat praise for their work might turn to self-publishing as an alternative. It’s a viable alternative when there is an established audience.
But if you self publish, you need to know what you are facing. Spending thousands of dollars on your book before it is printed. Spending your money on marketing, promoting and publicizing your book. Buying up copies to sell to your friends and family. Spending hundreds of hours being a bookseller, a marketer, a retailer–hours that would be better spent writing your next book.
If you are a writer who checks their email daily, you have seen the messages about Harlequin Horizons, the self-publishing arm of Harlequin Enterprises. You know what it’s all about, so I’m not going into detail here. You can read about it here, here and here. And that’s two of three links that are Harlequin information and responses. Here’s Writer’s Beware on the matter.
But here’s the scoop:
* Harlequin has created a self-publishing imprint called “Harlequin Horizons” which requires that you, the writer, pay to have your book published. There are a variety of options starting at $599, plus 50% of net proceeds. So not only do you pay to produce and print your book, you’re splitting the royalties as well. They have no risk–you have all the risk. Yet they still get 50% of every copy sold. After YOU pay to publish the book. Does anyone else see something wrong with that?
* If you submit a manuscript to Harlequin and they reject it, they’ll send you a little note suggesting self-publishing–and Harlequin Horizons–as an option.
* Harlequin has stated that they are not using the Harlequin brand on the Horizons books, that they are simply using the Harlequin name to entice writers to consider self-publishing their romance novels using the services they provide through the vanity press Author Solutions.
$599 is the bare minimum cost. It goes up–WAY up–from there. For example, if you want an “Editorial Review” that’ll cost you $342. Okay you’re thinking–$342 is a very reasonable price to have your manuscript edited. Think again. This covers the first chapter only. You want line editing? That’s .035 cents a word. Content editing? Another .042 cents a word. Or get the whole package–evaluation, content and line editing for .077 cents a word. That’s $7,700 for a 100,000 word novel.
Then there’s marketing, book trailers, review copies, and a host of ala carte services. But they also offer packages which include some or all of their services.
Let’s say you buy the basic $599 package, but want the full editing. $8300. You have a trade book printed at $15 cover price. You think that $15 is yours?
Think again.
There is a cost to printing. Notice that Harlequin Horizons only pays you 50% of net proceeds. What is net? Hmm, don’t know. In traditional publishing, the retailers generally “pay” half the cover price. So a $15 book is $7.50 to the retailer and $7.50 to the publisher. Out of the $7.50 to the publisher, they pay for printing, overhead (editorial, cover design, marketing, shipping, etc) and $1.125 per book to the author at a 7.5% standard royalty rate for trade.
There is a cost to print the book POD (which is higher per book than a mass printed novel), e-tailers who sell (i.e. Amazon) take a portion, etc. But let’s be generous and say that the net proceeds are $10 on a $15 book. You, the author, get $5. Yeah! You’re already making nearly five times more money per book than the schmuck who goes the traditional publishing route.
Except, you need to sell 1,660 books to recoup your hard outlay to get that book in print. That doesn’t include your website, ads, etc where you need to try to SELL your book to the public because your book will not be distributed. How will people find your book on Amazon? You need to drive them there. How? LOTS of money, time and hard work.
I am not picking on Harlequin specifically, though it may seem so because they are under the gun right now with this venture. And honestly? They should be. Harlequin is a fantastic brand that has proven to be the face of romance. They publish quality romance novels at an affordable price and appeal to a mass audience around the world. Yet now they are diluting their brand, IMO, by printing self-published books. Because you know that every one of those authors who self-publishes will put on their website and promotional material that they are a Harlequin Author.
Romance Writers of America made a very brave and ballsy statement to the industry by removing Harlequin from its recognized “eligible” publishers–essentially limiting the perks available to Harlequin at RWA expense at conference. I commend RWA and its board of directors for standing up for writers of all genres, and romance writers in particular.
Money flows TO the author. Repeat as needed anytime you get the urge to give someone money to publish your book. Or listen to Harlan Ellison:
I went over to Nathan Bransford’s blog this evening with the title: You Tell Me: Why Are So Many People Writing Books These Days? I posted a comment which said that perhaps instant communication has just spread the news so more people SEEM to be writing a book, when in the past–pre-Internet (remember those days? I do. My kids don’t.)–no one knew who was writing and who wasn’t.
I’ve been writing nearly my entire life. Why? Because I couldn’t NOT write. It’s the way God made me. I love to write, even when I hate it. I love stories, even when I’m pulling my hair out because I can’t get a scene right. It’s part of me like my eye color–it’s in my genes. I am a writer.
Are more people writing a book? Probably. Why? Because they think it’s easy to get published. And guess what, it is. If you have the money, you can be published. Can you sell those books? Who knows? But you can be “published.” Or, rather, printed.
How many times have we heard: “I could write a book if I only had the time.” My answer? Bullshit. (Pardon my French.) Writers MAKE the time. We would rather write than sleep. When I started seriously writing in 2002–meaning, I stopped playing around and decided to focus on becoming a better writer and finishing a book–I gave up television, I gave up a couple hours of sleep, and I created a block of time to write and learn and improve and screw up and write some more.
How many times have we heard: “Writing’s easy.” Really? Easy? Finish a book, edit the book, get an agent, sell to a publisher (who pays you) and then tell me it’s easy. And I have news for you (okay, not YOU, faithful readers of MSW, who already know this) but it doesn’t get any easier.
How many times have we heard: “My book is better than the crap publishers are putting out” or “Readers just want to read junk.” Ahem. Publishers publish books to make money. Readers buy books to be entertained or learn something they want to know. Publishers make money when they sell to a large audience, hence the phrase (not the format) “Mass Market” or “Mass Audience.” There is a market for niche books, and small press and e-press are filling those spots very nicely–with books that the authors don’t have to pay to produce (over and above our hard expenses of computer, paper, postage, and chocolate or wine–you know, the necessities for writers.)
There is an easy way to be published–do it yourself with your own money. Write the book, edit the book, print the book, market, distribute and publicize the book. But that doesn’t make you an author. It makes you an author/editor/printer/marketer/distributor/publicist.
Writers write. Editors edit. Publicists publicize. Pick your profession and be the best at it you can be. But if you are promoting and selling your books? That’s time away from your writing, and you’ll never get better if you don’t write.






















Very well said.
Great post, Allison. I admit I’ve lost more than a few hours of writing over this, and am firmly in the “this is a seriously bad idea that will negatively impact the brand and the business” camp.
Harlequin has stood head and shoulders above the rest of the romance publishers this past year, garnering some of the best media coverage. They’ve done a stellar job of promoting the genre along with their leadership and quality, not to mention putting plusses in their parent company’s revenue column on a consistent basis. I am baffled that they would make this murky, questionable move, and already the seriously negative press has started. See this:
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2009/11/harlequin-hacks.html
I fear the dilution of the brand, I hurt as a Harlequin published author who will be tainted with the vanity press brush, and I beg my many yet-to-be published friends to do their homework and not fall prey to the overpriced promises of dream fulfillment and brand recognition that Harlequin Horizons is offering.
RWA announcement yesterday that effective immediately Harlequin is no longer “RWA eligible” means, in essence, they are not given free space for meetings and promotion at the National conference. How this affects the future of the RITA awards and PAN membership of new HQ (non Horizons) authors is yet to be seen. From my vantage point — and believe me, HQ is a huge part of my conference experience, so I hate that this will impact their presence — I think the RWA Board is to be congratulated for taking a clear stance on this, and a quick one.
Now, I would really like to get back to writing this week…anybody else lose page time over this?
I’ve lost a little writing time, but only through loops. I didn’t read anything online except Malle’s comments on the SBTB site when someone posted the link, and the NYT article (I hadn’t seen the New Yorker–very sad.)
Rocki, it doesn’t just hurt Harlequin author it hurts all ROMANCE authors. Not because others (men and women) go down the self-publishing route but because Harlequin IS romance in the eyes of the reading public. I wrote this blog basically to voice my opinion on the matter, praise RWA for their position, and leave it. I’m not engaged in the debate elsewhere because others have said it better than me.
I’m hoping Harlequin will do a 180. But with this kind of money at stake–Bowker’s reported that half of all titles were self-published in 2008–I don’t think they care. They’re trying to have their cake and eat it too–they want to be the face of romance AND capitalize on scam. And it IS a scam because the overwhelming vast majority (like 99.99%) of self-published books sell no copies to anyone outside the author and her close friends and family.
Something else worth noting for anybody thinking about trying this…
I can’t remember where I heard the figure, but I do recall hearing that MOST self-pubbed books sell less than 100 copies.
So unless you’re in the very small percentage that sells more? You’re going to be looking at a huge expense and you’re not very likely to see any profit-worse, you’re out of a lot of $$
The very few (extremely few) success stories in the self-publishing business have propagated the myth that this is a viable option toward becoming a professional writer. The amount of money writers have to pay to get their book published is insane. It’s cheaper for me to go to Kinkos and print out 20 bound ARCs with a nice color cover on card stock–and Kinkos is a high-end copy place.
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by authorterryo: Good recap of the Harlequin/Self Publishing at Murder She Writes http://bit.ly/4MW7o…
Outstanding points, Allison. This is definitely one of those announcements that makes you sit back and think. I’ve always been amazed by Harlequin’s aggressiveness when it comes to delving into new areas of the industry. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. But I appreciate their efforts to stay fresh and on top of the marketplace. I’m not sure how this will pan out but I’m not surprised at all that Harlequin is testing the waters of what some see as a significant future path of book publishing. There’s much to weigh as to how this will impact the industry and each of us personally. I’m still trying to figure it all out! It’s a little unsettling, but I’m trying to get right with how the publishing world has changed over the past decade. I wholeheartedly agree with your words of wisdom–write! Write the very best books possible! The only way to do that is to write through the good times and the bad–AND the confusion!
Thanks, Allison, for an insightful post.
It absolutely baffles me to think that an intelligent being would opt for HH’s platform when there are several established and reputable digital publishing platforms that ask NOTHING to host a self-published book. They take a percentage of each sale, but that’s true of HH and its distribution channels as well.
I started self-publishing last month (and, Shiloh, I’m happy to report that that 100 copy sales benchmark definitely does not apply even to re-released work) and places like Smashwords (with its “premium distribution” to Barnes & Noble, Sony, Fictionwise, and Shortcovers) make it easy to succeed. Amazon’s Digital Text Platform is free and will get your book on the Kindle rolls. And the folks at All Romance eBooks, where my sales are greatest, are absolutely wonderful to work with.
An author doesn’t have to use self-publishing as a last resort. For some, it’s a lucrative and viable alternative to jumping through the “traditional” publishing hoops.
Alessia, I appreciate your comments and as you point out, there are options to self-publishing that do not including outlaying thousands of dollars AND giving a percentage of the sales to the printer. I do believe, however, that writers who want a career won’t find it in the self-publishing world unless they not only have quality, well-written, well-edited books, but a platform and marketing plan and understand that they will have to help drive sales. Most traditionally published authors don’t have to do that (I know, some publishers are pushing authors to do more–but it’s not required and my publisher has never asked me to do anything.) I, personally, don’t want to sell books. I have never sold my books–even when I’m asked to speak and bring them. I’ll bring my mom and copies I’ve borrowed from Borders and my mom sells those, and I give the $$ to Borders. I will not be a bookseller.
This news has stunned me. When HQ announced their e-pub venture, I thought, “well that’s interesting.” E-books are a viable market and I am interested to see how this works out.
But this? It’s destructive to the already disintegrating business model in which Money Flows To The Author.
I write because I love it. I may never be published that’s reality. That doesn’t mean I’m going to stop writing nor am I going to shell out my hard earned money so that I can have a “real book” in my hands w/ my name on it.
Publisher’s already get the lion’s share of the money. An author usually gets 20-35% for royalties then the agent gets their 15%, and Uncle Sam comes in and gets 30-40% of that. This just seems like another way for the publisher to take money from the writer.
I write because that’s the way God made me. I couldn’t NOT write. If I wasn’t published, I wouldn’t be writing full-time, but I’d be writing SOMETHING all the time.
Here’s the scoop on how much a book costs and who gets what. This is print books, because that’s what I know.
A $7.99 mass market pays 8% royalties on the cover price. Most traditional publishers offer an advance against royalties. Some undercut and offer less than $5K, but most midlist authors are going to get between $10-30K per book advance. (Midlist is authors who haven’t hit lits, have modest print runs–usually 35-80K, and little or no co-op–front of story placement.)
Let’s say $8 because that’s easier to do math
Traditional brick & mortar stores:
The bookseller gets $4.
The publisher gets $4.
The publisher pays for shipping, accepts returns, pays for editorial, overhead, cover design, marketing, sales, sales kits, co-op, production, etc. This is why publishers like big sellers and large print runs–the diminishing cost of returns. It’s why authors when they sell over XX number of copies get higher royalties on additional sales. Of that $4, they pay the author 64 cents. That leaves $3.36 per book to pay for everything else. They take the risk, they deserve a profit. I’m not willing to take the risk, thus I want an advance. An advance against royalties means that if my advance is $10,000, I need to sell 16,400 copies to “earn out” my advance.
I could possible negotiate a deal for higher royalties and less money up front. I have no problem in theory with that business model provided that the books are well-distributed. Vanguard is one publisher that has been working this way and has major author on their list. But they don’t print mass markets, only hardcover (maybe some trade, but mostly hardcover.) My readership isn’t a hardcover readership, so for me this wouldn’t be a smart business move at this point.
Publishers are suffering, authors are suffering, the whole damn economy is suffering. And part of the problem is that people in general want more for less and often look to the “easy” way. Self-publishing is NOT easy. But most people don’t realize that until they’ve drained their savings.
Okay, I really need to stop. I’m getting myself mad again.
Thanks, Allison, for the information. I got the percent info from an Agent website. I didn’t realize they were so off.
Oh, and sorry didn’t mean to get you riled up.
I think that’s the best breakdown I’ve seen yet and it answers so much. I don’t agree with vanity presses, but I’m with you on the self pub.
Publishing as we know it is broken if these bastion companies are scavenging like this. And what is an author to do to make sure she don’t get tossed to the bottom of the pile becuase she’s just not box A or box B? Writers are so often working a day job to pay bills, where does this all leave us?
As for what RWA did, I understand it, really, but in the long run I think it’s going to cause more harm than good. UNLESS HQN capitulates and I just don’t see them doing that. I hope I’m wrong.
I don’t think that RWA standing up for the writers that make up their organization is a bad thing. This is an important issue. We have to draw the line and make a stand. Too often, we roll over and take it because we’re afraid. We turn our backs because something doesn’t effect us directly. But this does effect all writers, published and unpublished, traditionally published or e-published or self-published.
If a writer wants to self-publish, go ahead. If they are making a well-informed choice, great. But paying these huge fees and getting only 50% of proceeds is a rip-off, and we need to make sure that aspiring writers understand this.
Thank you for putting it in blunt, no-nonsense terms. This has been a travesty and I am still shaking my head thinking, “HQN, what the HELL are you thinking?”
This will make ALL romance writers look bad and IMO, it’s just a way to mine the slush pile for money. Sad, and very, very bad.
Yasmine
Yasmine, I’m very conservative fiscally and I think capitalism and free enterprise are great business models. However, what bothers me tremendously is that this business is exploiting dreams of women who see that carrot of “Harlequin will be monitoring sales” and spend their life savings in the hopes of being one of the chosen. And for a company that is all about romance, women, independence, happy endings, intelligence, and justice–at least in their books–this is far too cutthroat for me. If a woman has all the information to make a smart and informed decision, and she still makes a bad choice, I can live with that. But someone on some loop (apologies for not remembering) said that when you’re rejected, you are emotionally at a low point. And to get a letter offering this carrot, you have hope–and you jump. You chase that carrot because a company you LIKE and RESPECT and is REPUTABLE has held out the carrot.
Author Solutions could not do this on their own. That Author Solutions exists and promotes self-publishing does not bother me–more power to them. But this whole deal makes me ill. I know too many writers who can’t afford it who will see hope that “if only” they do this, and spend $10,000, and push their books, and promote, and take out an ad in RT, and go to every conference, and sell at their church and their kids school . . . they, too, may be a “real” Harlequin author. But when will they recoup that cost? Even the most successful lines may earn out at $20-25K. And that’s the MOST successful lines. That’s why Harlequin authors write 2, 3, 4 books a year. You can make a good living if you are a good writer, a great storyteller, and productive. You can’t do that self-publishing.
Ok, sorry for the rant. It’s not you, Yasmine, you know I love you
A-freakin-men to the above. Great post, Allison.
This will dilute the Harlequin brand. For the one company who was profitable this past year, it reeks of greed. They posted profits when no one else did, and this is a slap in the face to the authors who helped them get into that positive position, since they’ll let any unedited manuscript now have a version of their name on the cover.
I’m impressed that the RWA board moved so swiftly and stood up to this giant.
[...] Author Allison Brennan This entry was posted on Thursday, November 19th, 2009 at 4:56 pm and is filed under Industry, Links to more interesting people than I, RWA, Romancelandia, blah blah blah. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [...]
[...] Harlequin’s decision to become a vanity publisher, here are a few links you might check out: Allison Brennan’s take on it; Jackie Kessler’s analysis of Harlequin’s letter to its writers, a Smart [...]
Great post–and it’s a relief to see big names respond strongly to this fiasco. Nora Roberts piped up over at Smart Bitches. Perhaps if there’s enough pressure from the money-makers someone at H/S will listen…
I wonder has anyone run into any posts by a well-known author saying the hahoz plan isn’t a bad idea?
I haven’t seen anything from any traditionally published authors thinking this is a good or neutral idea.
Good post Allison.
Oh and HollyD, I wish I got 35% royalties, author’s are lucky to see 10%.
Things are changing so fast, my head is spinning. I do wonder what this is going to do to the industry? And I’m curious as to why other publishers with their fingers in the self-publishing pie seem to be exempt? Is it because they don’t *brand* those endeavours? I’m thinking specifically of Random House and Xlibris.
I have no answers, just questions and curiosity, from over here in the peanut gallery.
Silver, the problem with this new venture is that Harlequin (and Thomas Nelson) are using their good brand–their name which is respected in the industry–to sell writers who they reject to go the self-publishing route. Random House does not do that. They are part owner of Xlibris, but they don’t send a letter to everyone they reject, “I’m sorry, this isn’t right for Random House, but self publishing is an option over at our company . . . “
Yeah, I can see how that would be problematic. I think I’ll stay here on the sidelines and watch the fallout. I just hope there’s not scorched earth when all is said and done. My sympathies to the HQN authors caught in the crossfire.
Read Nora Roberts comments here:
http://www.smartbitchestrashybooks.com/index.php/weblog/comments/want-to-self-publish-how-about-harlequin/P300/
It’s a publishing lesson AND an etiquette lesson all in one.
I knew if I came over to MSW Allison would be brave enough to say something about the current fiasco. Yeah!!!
I wrote somewhere yesterday, This is all to the good for Harlequin. If your book is just “pretty good” (in Kristin Nelson’s words) they can send you to HH, let you build yourself and readership up, then scoop you up for no outlay of money by them at all. Actually, you will have spent all the money. Definitely win-win for Harlequin.
Not only have YOU spent the money, but to actually make a dent in the sales you probably will have spent 3-10 times the average Harlequin advance AND you will have been selling your books, not writing the next one.
Okay, my thoughts on the SBTB thread.
It’s not traditional publishing vs self-publishing as two equal and viable options. Self-publishing costs the author a LOT of money. Traditional publishing doesn’t
Traditionally published authors are self-employed, and thus have business expenses. The Internet. A computer. Paper. Toner. Continuing education (class, conferences.) A web site. Sometimes we also print promotional material (bookmarks, teasers.)
We sold our rights to a publisher to have our book edited, printed, the cover designed, put in the sales kit, distributed to stores. THEY pay US for the book. So with that money, we can (and should) take a portion to support our business.
Self-publishing? It’s the opposite. We PAY to have our book printed, we PAY to have it edited, we PAY to market it, to distribute it (online only, because most bookstores will NOT accept self-published books for sale.) We sell the book out of the back of our car.
SOMETIMES, this is a viable option for SOME books and authors, but mostly it’s a boondoggle that does not launch a career as an author.
I am a career author. I run my writing like a business, even though the WRITING part is creative.
One of the comment threads states that even traditionally published authors spend tons of money trying to get published.
No, we don’t. SOME do. We take classes, we educate ourselves, we network, we buy books to LEARN ABOUT THE CRAFT.
Honestly? I joined RWA in 2003–the year before I sold–because I thought it would help me learn more about the publishing business. It did, and I’m thankful for the organization and the published authors who reached out and shared their wisdom. I never went to conference until AFTER I sold because I couldn’t afford it. The ONLY craft book I bought before I sold was SELF-EDITING FOR FICTION WRITERS. I took three on-line classes through the Kiss of Death and one through TARA and one through another RWA group before I sold. And Laurie Campbell’s writing the selling synopsis class. That’s 6 classes, about $120. I spent more money on PAPER and POSTAGE than on conferences and education.
I wrote five books before I sold. I had an agent request for my first book. She rejected it. I could have said, “She’s a fool.” (Well, she was, but not because she rejected that book which WASN’T PUBLISHABLE) and then self-published, but I wanted to find an agent and knew that the only way to do that was to keep writing and learning and improving.
Over 100 rejections and five manuscripts later, I sold.
Not once has my publisher asked me to spend money to promote my books. What I do to promote my books is part of my business plan–a website, bookmarks, sending free books out, conferences. Whatever I do supports what THEY do, not because they asked me but because it’s my career plan.
Okay, now I really have to get back to work–because I only get paid when I write.
Obviously, I have no experience with anything related to that, but I thought I’d stop by and leave you a hug, Allison *hug*. You seem upset!
Thanks Barbie! Hug gladly accepted.
I am upset, I suppose, but probably more indignant. I don’t like bullies. There are few people more vulnerable than women who have been rejected, whether by a man, a friend, or a business. And to go after them at their MOST vulnerable moment. It’s crass. But I wouldn’t care if Harlequin sold all the rejected authors in a list to Author Solutions, who then followed up. But to have it come from Harlequin–who I had tons of respect and admiration for as a leader in this industry–hits me wrong.
I was reading the link you posted and I think I was fairly educated on the matter
I understand your point. As someone who wishes to get published some day, I have no illusions that just because I have a book out there with my name printed on the cover, it means that it’s going to sell it. I don’t think of myself as the ‘next [insert famous author here] or the new face of the writing industry.
But I do realize there are A LOT of people who in fact believe that they ARE the next hottest thing (and they might be, if given the right opportunities), who are pissed with every single publisher out there, and feel they are just going to do it on their own and make the publishers who reject them beg for forgiveness. People who have been trying for a long time, and just can’t understand why aren’t all publishers fighting for their copyrights.
And, if they are all of that they believe or not is practically irrelevant if they don’t get the right publicity, the market, the press. I mean, it’s not like people will dream about their book and suddenly everyone will buy it. Good writing isn’t, unfortunately or maybe fortunately, I don’t know, all it takes for a person to be successful in this business, and many people don’t realize the time and the money that is put into that, especially if you’re self-publishing. So, they fall for the nice advertising and end up not only still unknown, without having proved anything to anyone else — and maybe feeling like more of a failure — and still lost a bunch of money.
Now, did I understand the point or am I not only WAY out of my league but also speaking nonsense?
You got it.
I just want people to know what they’re getting into. There is self-publishing options that work–for certain projects–if the author knows that they aren’t going to be making tons of sales and they’ll be working their ass off for the ones they do make. There are self-publishing success stories. But Harlequin Horizons is vanity press plain and simple. You pay for everything–and they still get 50% of the net proceeds. WTF?
You have to pay for editing. Readers are not going to be fooled for long. They buy a couple Horizons books that are NOT edited, are they going to take another chance?
I thought the first manuscript I finished was brilliant. NOT! Fortunately, I’m generally humble and after re-reading it realized it was crap and started over. Most writers get better with practice.
This is a bad idea across the board for all writers and the industry. The frightening thing is, it’s truly about the $$$$, and I fear that when HH makes $$$$ at this, then other houses will jump on the band wagon. Plain and simple, this is what I call “Stealing people’s dreams.” It feels so icky. Yes–the publishing industry needs to make changes, but not ones like this.
I just heard that harlequin in response to their authors concerns is removing harlequin from the vanity press name. new name tba. this softens the blow some, but they are still mining slushpiles and imho making veiled promises.
But if they’re still the ones reaping the profits, is that right? It sounds like one of those agent rejection letters that says, “your book is good, but could use a good editorial service. We recommend you have XYZ edit your book, then resubmit.” And if you look into it, XYX just happens to be the agent’s company.
yep, still a vanity press.
Oh, there’s no doubt it’s still a vanity press, no question about the predatory practices.
BUT… this does shrink the pool of those they can prey on, to some point.
I posted over at DA and just pasting here.
Shiloh, I think it’s a start definitely, though I still believe that sending solicitations to self-publish with any company (regardless of the name) with rejections will still come on Harlequin letterhead and thus be “endorsed” by Harlequin.
But that they are responding to legitimate concerns is a step in the right direction.
BTW, I was reviewing the Thomas Nelson deal earlier and they charge more for the same or similar “services” as Author Solutions charges Horizons “authors.” Christians tend to be very trusting and again, this is predatory IMO. There’s a reason why con artists often target churches, the elderly and young women. They’re more susceptible to trust.
Exactly Terry.
That’s my other big issue. Stop the referral. Make them two separate entitles. I’d be more satisfied.
And if they did that AND did true self pub instead of expecting 50% of net from their author’s profits? I’d be downright happy.
Allison, thank you for this post. Very educational!
Okay, I read the whole post, but have skipped the comments. HQ is wrong. RWA is right, as I already knew.
However, when you start your post with the cavalier phrase that you won’t quibble over the difference between self-publishing and vanity publishing, you forfeit credibility in my eyes. Further, when you pretend that traditional publishers are going to be doing all of the promotion and sales of the books, you slide into outright funny paper land. It may work that way for you, and if it does, congrats.
Take a look at the self-financed tours and selling blitzes undertaken by authors published in the traditional way. Take a look at the three book death spiral. Take a good hard look. I have. Most writers are screwed big time but take the lousy pay and treatment in order to become “published” by the New York establishment. HQ tried to pull a fast one. But if you ask me, the deals that most mid-listers get are just awful, too, and every bit as deceptive.
Lyn, I appreciate your comments, and while self-publishing has a place in the market for certain projects, most self-published titles do not sell more than 100 copies to readers. It’s a way for a writer to get their book printed. For some niche markets it works well. For most, it doesn’t. But you’re right, I should have made a distinction except that then self-published authors would come by and say oh, I agree with everything, and this is vanity, but I’m self-published and it’s great and this is why. I didn’t want that. Why? Because I honestly don’t think that self-publishing is the right option for most books. If requires a lot of work–writing, editing, marketing, distribution, selling, etc. It means the author bears all the costs and all the risks. That works for some. It doesn’t work for me and it doesn’t work for most aspiring writers. The unfortunately thing is that many aspiring writers buy into the belief that the model works for MOST people and often spend thousands of dollars–even with legitimate self-publishing–and never see any return on their investment.
As for NY publishing, I would take a NY contract over me paying for publishing any day. Money should flow TO the author. Period. It’s not perfect. But it doesn’t require the author to spend money to print, publish or distribute their book. I also think that traditionally published authors spend way too much money on promotion that doesn’t work and less time on writing books. I don’t believe that the “deals most mid-listers get are just awful, too, and every bit as deceptive.” There is a HUGE difference. In self-publishing and vanity publishing, the AUTHOR pays to be published. In traditional publishing, the PUBLISHER pays the author for the rights to publish their book. That is not just as awful, or deceptive.
Do some authors get screwed? Yep. It happens in every business. But we’re still being paid for our writing without having to outlay thousands of dollars for the privilege.
Allison, all I have to add to this is:
BRAVA!!!!!
GREAT explanation of this:
http://graysonagency.com/blog/publishing/harlequin-horizons-a-mugs-game/
Allison,
Thank you for making your point so candidly and succinctly.
I’d like to add that writing is a creative process; publishing what you write is BUSINESS. In business, when I solve a client’s problem and provide her with a product or service, SHE PAYS ME–I do NOT do all the hard work and then pay her. When a reader buys a book, she is paying for the pleasure of being entertained or informed. As you said, the money should flow back to the author. Period. That’s business.
I think it’s a darn shame, already, that authors spend months/years writing a book and make such a small % of the selling price. But for a publisher, any publisher, to infer that paying a TRADITIONAL, NY PUBLISHER will make you a “professional” writer is outright thievery. Doesn’t “professional” mean you get paid? As in “professional athletes?”
I have lots of other thoughts, but they all echo your comments or those of previous commenters. I am proud that the professional organzations of which I’m a member, both MWA and RWA, are defending their members–both pubbed and unpubbed.
[...] does this suck? I’m going to let Allison Brennan answer that, because she did so on her group blog and she did it far better than I could. You have a trade book printed at $15 cover price. You think [...]
Allison, thanks for adding your very valuable two cents to the uproar. Harlequin’s actions break my heart for all their authors, the editors, and other employees who had no choice or voice in the decision.
BTW–just wanted to say you are my very favorite “am-hardly-able-to-read-her-books” author because you do scary SO well.
Author Solutions published 13,000 titles last year. Titles that vary in content and quality. Titles that perhaps didn’t quite fit a publisher’s existing lines. Those books already exist, but are the readers buying them?
And if not, why? (IMHO they aren’t. 2,500,000 copies were sold of 13,000 titles. That first number sounds impressive, right? But divide that down to the average number of copies sold per title = 192. Depressing.)
Those books I spoke of are no different than the products readers will receive through Harlequin Horizons. Because these are Author Solutions products, not Harlequin products. Products designed to lure in writers, not readers. (13,000 packages sold to writers at a BASE price of $599 multiplies out to $7,887,000. Cha-ching )
Thanks for the article, Allison.
You have strong and interesting points. It makes me re-evaluate and realize that each sector has its own role and function. This is perhaps the most comprehensive post i’ve ever read about self-publishing and Harlequin. Thanks!
I doubt anyone can change HQ’s endeavour in this. Though I wish if they’d wanted to try something new, they’d have not only put their name on it, but their personnel.
Because while I will not switch my position and tell new writers this type of model is the way to go, I will have to tell them, if you insist on going with it, don’t use Harlequin Horizons.
Something along the lines of:
In this list of names, which would you consider a self-publishing model versus a vanity- sorry- assisted self-publishing model? Word Clay, Trafford, Author House, Xlibris, IUniverse, Westbow or Harlequin Horizons?
I ask, because they are all the same, except the pricing. Pricing for the EXACT same services. Why do I question the difference in pricing? Because you get the services from the EXACT same parent company, AUTHOR SOLUTIONS. That guy making your cover for IUniverse could be the same guy working on your Harlequin Horizons cover, only for a different price charged to you.
Legal, sure. But don’t expect to get better quality just because of the moniker. Auto mechanics have known this little trick for years. The same replacement part will fit two different models, but one car has a sticker price of 15K while the other a sticker price of 30K. The smart mechanic always names the lower value car when requesting the item. Why? Because it’s half the cost doing it that way. For the SAME darn part.